MU Catalog » Policies »

Academic Probation and Dismissal

It is expected that matriculants-part time and full time, graduate and undergraduate-will make continuous progress toward a degree in a timely manner. In support of those efforts, the University, through the Admissions and Academic Standards Committee, reserves the right to take the following academic actions:

Appealing an Academic Dismissal from the University

If a student wishes to appeal an academic dismissal from the University, the following procedures must be observed:

  1. All appeals must be in writing. The appeals are to be addressed to the associate vice president for Academic Affairs. Appeals will be reviewed by the Committee on Admissions and Academic Standards.
  2. Appeals are due to the Office of the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs by the date specified in the letter of dismissal. No appeals will be accepted after this time. It is the student's responsibility, whether in the United States or abroad, to be aware of mail sent to them by the University. The University will make every attempt to contact the student in writing using the addresses on file with the Registrar's Office.
  3. An appeal must explain in full the student's reasons for seeking a reversal of the academic dismissal. It should also propose a plan for returning the student to good academic standing.
  4. Appeals will be responded to in writing by the associate vice president for Academic Affairs on behalf of the chair and Committee on Admissions and Academic Standards. The response of the vice president to the written appeal will bring the process to an official end.

Students who have been readmitted to the University after three or more semesters of academic dismissal will return to the University under the catalog in force at the time of their readmission and must meet the requirements of their degree program stated in that catalog.

These directives are to be reviewed annually by the Admissions and Academic Standards Committee and they may be suspended when, in the opinion of the Committee, the interests of the student and of the University will best be served by such suspension. Such action, however, may not be construed as a precedent by any petitioner.